Jyothish v. The Assistant Sub Inspector Of Police, Chalissery Police Station
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/16TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 2129 of 2015 (M) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- JYOTHISH, S/O. KERISHNAN, AGED 29 YEARS, CHANAYIL, PORKULAM P.O., PORKULAM VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISUR DISTRICT (OWNER OF LORRIES BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL- 40-A-3451, KL-8Y-6027, KL-17-259 AND A JCB BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL-8-4455) BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHALISSERY POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 682 131.
2. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY JOINT SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
R1,R2 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ KUNJACHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 2129 of 2015 (M) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR DT. 16.1.15 PREPARED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXT P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE GO(MS) NO. 20/14/ID DTD. 12.2.14 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.
EXT P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DT. 07.4.14 IN WPC NO. 8183/2014 OF THIS HONORUABLE COURT.
EXT P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DT. 07.10.14 IN WPC NO. 25846/2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.2129 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner submits that he has got release of the vehicles on payment of Rs.25,000/- each. He expresses his intention to compound the offence.
2. Therefore considering that the petitioner has compounded the offence, treating the amount already paid as compounding fee, all further proceedings shall be dropped and a report shall be filed before the competent jurisdictional Magistrate regarding compounding the offence, if any crime is registered.
The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE