C.K. Poulose v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/3RD ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9450 of 2007 (Y) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- C.K.POULOSE, AGED 67, S/O KUNJU VAREED, CHAKALAMATTATH HOUSE, IRINJALAKUDA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, L S G D DIVISION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-3.
3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WADAKKANCHERY SUB DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, AYYANTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR.
R2 & R3 BY ADVS. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN SMT.P.A.ANITHA R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 9450 of 2007 (Y) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DTD.18.6.2004.
EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT DTD.23.2.2006.
EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE PETITIONER TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT DTD.14.6.2005.
EXT.P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DTD.20.5.2006.
EXT.P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DTD.2.6.2006.
EXT.P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY BY THE PETITIONER TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT DTD.12.6.2006.
EXT.P7: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE PETITIONER TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT DTD.6.6.2006.
EXT.P8: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SUIT OS.NO.256/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, WADAKKANCHERY DTD.11.5.2006.
EXT.P9: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DTD.5.12.2006.
EXT.P10: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DTD.19.12.2006.
EXT.P11: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DTD.1.1.2007.
EXT.P12: A TRUE COPY FO THE COMMUNICATION BY THE PETITIONER DTD.9.2.2007 TO THE PRESENT PRESIDENT OF THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH. EXT.P13: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DTD.21.2.2007.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.9450 of 2007 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 25th day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed in the year 2007 challenging Ext.P13 order canceling an award of work as per the agreement dated 18.6.2004.
This Court is of the view, the matter has become infructuous. However, the petitioner is free to challenge any risk and costs imposed on him based on Ext.P13 notwithstanding disposal of this writ petition based on future cause of action. Leaving open all other issues, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln