Retnakaran v. Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/8TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2316 of 2015 (L) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------ RETNAKARAN, AGED 64 YEARS S/O.MADHAVAN, HARIMANDIRAM, KADUVUMKAL VALLIKUNNAM P.O. 690 501.

BY ADVS.SRI.D.SAJEEV (KAMBISSARI) SRI.P.BIJIMON RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------

1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.

2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAVELIKKARA PIN: 690 101.

3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, PIN: 690 501.

4. PRABHAKARAN, AGED 40, S/O.ANANDAN, APARNA, THEKKEMURI VALLIKUNNAM P.O. 690 501.

R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

jvt

WP(C).No. 2316 of 2015 (L) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :- ---------------------------- EXT.P1: THE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.2548 DATED 25/10/1978 OF BARANICAVU SRO ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF TAX RECEIPT DATED 16/7/2014 ISSUED BY VALLIKUNNAM VILLAGE ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF ORDER IN I.A 2422/14 IN OS 425/14 DATED 1.10.2014 PASSED BY MUNSIFF COURT, KAYAMKULAM. EXT.P4: THE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 15/1/15 MOVED BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.2 ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION. EXT.P5: THE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 14/1/15 MOVED BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL -------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag. C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

---------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.2316 of 2015 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of January 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ Heard the learned Government Pleader. No one entered appearance for the petitioner.

2.

By this writ petition, the petitioner prayed for a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to afford adequate and effective police protection to the petitioner and his family from the acts of violence by the 4th respondent.

3.

Learned Government Pleader submits that after receiving the complaint from the petitioner, the petitioner as well as respondent No.4 were called for a statement and from the statement it transpired that there is no threat of any kind from respondent No.4 and the petitioner has filed this writ petition only on an apprehension that some obstruction will be created in construction of the compound wall. We do not find any good ground to entertain the writ petition and hence, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE Jvt