High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2324/2015dismissed

K.K.Ali v. Tahsildar Udumbanchola

2015-02-06Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/17TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2324 of 2015 (M) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- K.K.ALI, S/O.KOCHUMUHAMMAD, KOTTATUDIYIL, POOPPARA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.SHINE MATHEWS(VADAKKEKARA) SRI.JOY C. PAUL RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. TAHSILDAR, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 554.

2. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHINNAKKANAL VILLAGE OFFICE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 566.

3. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 553.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.VINCENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

======================== W.P.(C). No. 2324 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

"i.

Direct the 2nd respondent to accept the land tax amount from the petitioner in respect of the property lying in Sy. No.52 (subdivision-13, 18, 19) in Block No.6 of Chinnakanal Village, Udumbanchola Taluk, Idukki.

ii.

Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate order or direction quashing Ext.P2 issued by the second respondent."

2. When the matter came up for consideration on 22.1.2015, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also the position is not different. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the cause of action.

The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

kp/-