High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2384/2015disposed of

Ajitha Suresh v. The Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies

2015-02-26Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/7TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2384 of 2015 (W) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------- AJITHA SURESH, AGED 38 YEARS W/O.SURESH, MALICHIRA, C.M.C.9 CHERTHALA.

BY ADV. SRI.B.PRAMOD RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:- -------------------

1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE CHERTHALA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1688, CHERTHALA P.O., CHERTHALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 688 524.

3. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THE CHERTHALA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1688 CHERTHALA P.O., CHERTHALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, PIN - 688 524.

4. P.S.SURESH KUMAR, KULATHARAKKATTU HOUSE, CMC 9, CHERTHALA ALAPPUZHA - 688 524.

R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN R2,R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN R2,R3 BY ADV. SRI.ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU T.K.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.R.RAJESH.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 2384 of 2015 (W) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.06.2013 ISSUED BY THE STATE GOVT.

EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE ARC NO.35/2014 BEFORE THE CO-OPERATIVE ARBITRATION COURT.

EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 18.12.2014 IN MALAYALA MANORAMA.

EXHIBIT P4. TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 19.12.2014 IN MALAYALA MANORAMA.

EXHIBIT P5. A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT APPEARED IN MATHRUBHOOMI 18.12.2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.2384 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The fourth respondent was dismissed from service by the second respondent Bank. The dismissal is challenged in A.R.C.No.35/2014 before the Cooperative Arbitration Court. The reinstatement of the fourth respondent can only be dependent on the verdict in the arbitration case. The apprehension of the petitioner that the fourth respondent would be reinstated pending arbitration case is misplaced. This is especially so since the order of dismissal has to be interfered with by the Co-operative Arbitration Court for such contingency.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.