M/S.Olam Agro India Limited v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2015/3RD MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2421 of 2015 (C) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- M/S.OLAM AGRO INDIA LIMITED, IX/102, VARIKOLY P.O., PUTHENCRUZ, ERNAKULAM-682 308, REP. BY ITS SENIOR EXECUTIVE (LEGAL & PERSONNEL) Mr.SANAL KUMAR BY ADVS.SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.KURYAN THOMAS RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, KALOOR, KOCHI- 682 017
2. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SCOPE MINAR, CORE-II, 4TH FLOOR, LAXMI NAGAR DISTRICT CENTRE, LAXMI NAGAR, NEW DELHI- 110 092 BY SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN,SC,EPF ORGANISATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-01-2015, ALONG WITH W.P.(C).2424/15 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 2421 of 2015 APPENDIX EXHIBITS P1TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.12.2014 PASSED BY R1 P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 15.01.2015 (WITHOUT ANNEXURES) FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R2. //True Copy// P.A. To Judge
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).Nos. 2421 & 2424 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 23rd January, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
Identical petitioner is aggrieved by the demand raised as per two orders passed by the Employees Provident Fund Organization produced as Ext.P1 in both the writ petitions.
2. The contention of the petitioner is that, the appeal period expires only on 11.02.2015 and the order specifies that demand shall be satisfied within seven days. It is also submitted that, appeals have been filed within the time provided under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF & MP Act) before the Appellate Tribunal, the diary numbers of which are 145/2015 and 146/2015. The difficulty in seeking for waiver of predeposit and obtaining an interim order is insofar
WP(C).2421 & 2424/15 as there is no Presiding Officer in the Appellate Tribunal.
2. Especially considering the fact that the appeal period is not yet over and appeals have been filed, the demand against the petitioner as per Ext.P1 order in both the writ petitions, shall be kept in abeyance till 11.02.2015. If the petitioner is unable to obtain any orders from the Appellate Tribunal within that period, then there shall be a further stay on condition of payment of 30% of the amounts assessed within a period of two months from 11.02.2015. On such condition being satisfied, there shall be a stay of further demand till the appeals are disposed of by the Appellate Tribunal.
The writ petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//