Aylin Andrew Pereira v. The District Police Chief

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/4TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 2500 of 2015 (J) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ----------------

1. AYLIN ANDREW PEREIRA, AGED 25 YEARS D/O. ANDREW PEREIRA, RESIDING AT PATHISSERY HOUSE MULAVUCAUD P.O., ERNAKULAM.

2. ANIL ANDREW PEREIRA, AGED 21 YEARS D/O. ANDREW PEREIRA, RESIDING AT PATHISSERY HOUSE MULAVUCAUD P.O., ERNAKULAM.

BY ADV. SRI.P.SHANES METHAR RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------

1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

2. THE CIRLCE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERNAKULAM CENTRAL POLICE STATION ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 001.

3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER MULAVUCAUD POLICE STATION ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 126.

4. DENNIS JOSEPH FIGRUS S/O. PAVIYAN FIGRUS, RESIDING AT PATHISSERY HOUSE MULAVUKADU P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682 126.

R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

jvt

WP(C).No. 2500 of 2015 (J) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :- ---------------------------- EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO. 4368/04 OF SRO, ERNAKULAM AONG WITH TRANSLATED COPY.

EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DT. 30.7.14 ALONG WITH TRANSLATED COPY.

EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF WPC NO. 1641/15 ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA WITH OUT EXHIBITS. EXT.P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATON DT. 20.1.15 SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT, ALONG WITH TRANSLATED COPY. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL -------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.2500 of 2015 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of October 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to provide adequate protection to the life of the petitioners from the threat on the part of the 4th respondent and his men.

2.

Learned Government Pleader on instructions would submit that the petitioners are not residing in the address as shown in the writ petition and there is no threat as alleged. Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation, we close the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court, if there is any further cause of action arises. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE Jvt/27.10.2015