High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2632/2015disposed of

Kunhimuhammed Haji P v. The Malappuram Municipality

2015-02-06Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/17TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2632 of 2015 (D) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- KUNHIMUHAMMED HAJI P., S/O.KAMMED, PALAYAKKODAN HOUSE, MELMURI P.O.

MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.BABU S. NAIR SRI.RAKESH K.

RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MALAPPURAM MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 505.

2. THE SECRETARY THE MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY, MALAPPURAM MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 505.

R1 & R2 BY SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL SRI.E.S.M. KABEER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 2632 of 2015 (D) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 12.1.2015 AS NO. BA-177/14-15.

EXT.P-1(a):

TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P1. EXT.P-2:

TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTIES OF THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 2632 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 06th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

In the light of the ratio laid down in Praveen v. Land Revenue Commissioner [2010 (2) KLT 617], the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same lines, applying the ratio laid down by the learned Division Bench in the said decision, thereby quashing Exhibit P1.

2. Consequently, the second respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner for building permission afresh, if necessary, by referring the matter to the District Town Planner, and thereafter pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-