The Secretary, Kozhikode District Commercial Employees Union v. Labour Court, Kozhikode

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/22ND SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 2664 of 2015 (G) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ID 30/2013 of LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 11-04-2014 PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- THE SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL EMPLOYEES UNION KOZHIKODE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL EMPLOYEES UNION C.I.T.U., KOZHIKODE MEKHALA COMMITTEE, PALAYAM ROAD KOZHIKODE-1.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAVINDRA NATH SRI.N.KRISHNA PRASAD SRI.ARUN AJAY SHANKAR SRI.N.ANAND SRI.JIKKU SEBAN GEORGE RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-673 001.

2. MUHAMMED KOYA PROPRIETOR, MOOPANS HOTEL, CHERUVANNUR P.O.

FEROKE-673 631.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.M.RAFIQ BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.GIRIJA GOPAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 2664 of 2015 (G) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19/3/2013 IN G.O.(RT)NO.487/2013/LBR. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE CLAIM STATEMENT FILED BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE-I.D.NO.30/2013.

EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION STATEMENT DATED 22/7/2013 FILED BEFORE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIZKODE IN ID. NO.30/2013. EXT.P4. TRUE COPY OF THE REJOINDER FILED BEFORE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE IN ID 30/2013.

EXT.P5. TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF THE AWARD DATED 11/3/2014 PASSED BY THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHZIKODE IN ID NO.30/2013. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- Ext.R2(a):

TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND V.MUHAMMED, DATED 3.7.2015 RESOLVING THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THEM.

//True Copy// PS to Judge Rp

A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P. (C) No. 2664 of 2015 ================ Dated this, the 13th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P5 award by which the claim raised by the petitioner union on behalf of the workmen has been rejected.

2.

During the pendency of the above writ petition, parties have arrived at a settlement and an agreement has been executed between them, which is produced as Exhibit R2(a). In the light of Exhibit R2(a) agreement, I do not think that any further direction is required to be issued in the writ petition. Accordingly, taking on record the aforesaid agreement, this writ petition is closed. The terms of the agreement will form part of this judgment.

Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PS to Judge