E.Thankappan v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 2692 of 2015 (J) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- E.THANKAPPAN S/O.ERAVI, VINOD BHAVAN, THURUTHIKKARA P.O.
KUNNATHOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.K.P.ANIL KUMAR (SASTHAMCOTTA) RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE KUNNATHOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KUNNATHOOR P.O. KOLLAM-690540.
3. THE SECRETARY, SASTHAMCOTTAH BLOCK PANCHAYATH PORUVAZHY P.O.,SASTHAMCOTTAH, KOLLAM-690520 (AUTHORISED OFFICER SASTHAMCOTTAH BLOCK PANCHAYATH).
4. THE KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION BUILDING PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033.
5. SMT.THANKACHI SADANANDAN W/O.SADANANDAN, SANDHAYLAYAM, THRUTHIKKARA P.O. SASTHAMKOTTA, KOLLAM. 690 520 R4 BY ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMM R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.SIJU R2 BY ADV. SMT.S.SEETHA R1 BY ADV.K.A.SANJEETHA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 2112-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 2692 of 2015 (J) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.S1-1154/14 DT.9-1-15 ISSUED BY R3 TO ONE OF THE MEMBER SMT.REMADEVI V. OF THE R2 GRAMA PANCHAYATH, AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE COMMUNICATION NO.A3-2587/10 DT.201-15 ISSUED BY R2 TO R3 AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.20-1-15 IN OP 61/14 OF R4. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.2692 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The term is expired and the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
sks