High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2825/2015disposed of

Kochu Koshy Kunjumon v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2015-12-04Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 2825 of 2015 (C) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- KOCHUKOSHY KUNJUMON, KUZHIYIL THUNDIYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, KADAMPANAD NORTH P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K.SATHEES KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADOOR. PIN-689 101

2. THE TAHAZILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR- 689 101

3. SABU, SABU SADANAM, KADAMPANAD NORTH P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA-691 552.

R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K.SHERIN R3 BY ADV. SRI.S.SHAJAHAN (ADOOR) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 2825 of 2015 (C) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 23.12.2013.

P2 :

COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY ORDER DTD. 26.5.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

P3 :

COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER DTD. 13.10.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

P4 :

COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 10.11.2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C).No.2825 of 2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 4th Day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that no action has been taken to implement the order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Adoor as per Exhibit P3.

The learned Government Pleader submits that the order has been implemented on 07/03/2015. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Tahsildar, who was directed to implement the order has not complied with the entire direction. 3.

This Court is of the view that the petitioner is free to bring to the notice of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Adoor about any laches. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Adoor is free to consider the same and see that the order is implemented in its full spirit and purport. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms