High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2896/2015disposed of

K.M.Usman Riyalu v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Vatakara

2015-03-13Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/22ND PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2896 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------ K.M.USAMA RIYALU, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.RIYALU, ILLATH SADAKKATH KACHERI, ERANHIPALAM,P.O. KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA, PIN - 673 101.

2. RENEESH, S/O.MOIDEEN KOYA, FLORIKAN ROAD, KARIKKAMKULAM, KARAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE, PIN- 673 010.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 2896 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS ISSUING TIMINGS IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER'S SERVICE DATED 25.10.2007.

EXHIBIT P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT'S SERVICE DATED 14.02.2014. EXHIBIT P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE TIMING REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 11.04.2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

K.Vinod Chandran, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.2896 of 2015-J -------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with a timing tentatively settled for the service of the 2nd respondent, by Exhibit P2. Both the petitioner and the 2nd respondent are operating between Kannur and Thrissur.

2. Since Exhibit P2 itself specifically stated that the timings settled on the 2nd respondent by that order, is tentative, the petitioner has filed an objection, Exhibit P3, before the 1st respondent.

3. In the above circumstance, if Exhibit P3 objection is received in original by the 1st respondent, then a timing conference shall be convened in respect of the service of the 2nd respondent, expeditiously, and the petitioner's objection shall be considered in the timing conference so scheduled.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran, Judge vku.

[ true copy ]