High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2897/2015dismissed

Umarul Farook v. The Secretary

2015-02-06Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/17TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2897 of 2015 (J) ----------------------------------------- NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER(S) :

----------------------------------------------------------------------- UMARUL FAROOK, S/O.MUSTHAFA, 6/296, THOPPIL VEEDU, VADAKKEVILA P.O, PALLIMUKKU, KOLLAM - 691 010. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------------------------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM - 691 001 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 2897 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGULAR PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 19.11.2012.

EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 21.01.2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 2897 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 6th February, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non consideration of temporary permit application in which he contends that he has remitted the money as per the receipt produced along with Ext.P2 temporary permit application.

However, the learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that no application has been filed. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, asserts that the filing of the application is evidenced by Ext.P2. It is to be noticed that the money has been deposited in the Public Facilitation Centre and not in the Office of the Department. In such circumstances, there can be no assumption that the application itself has been filed.

The writ petition would stand dismissed.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//