High Court of KeralaWP(C)/3133/2014disposed of

Sasidharan v. State Of Kerala

2015-03-10Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/19TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 3133 of 2014 (N) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-----------------------

1. SASIDHARAN.K.

S/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 44 YEARS, ALLAMKOTU HOUSE, VELESWARAN, HARIPURAM POST, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. PIN-671 351.

2. KARUNAKARAN.T.V.

S/O.CHATHU, AGED 37 YEARS, MADIKKAL HOUSE, PULLUR, HARIPURAM POST, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. PIN-671 351. BY ADV. SRI.I.V.PRAMOD RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. SUB COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD AT KANHANGAD, SUB COLLECTOR'S OFFICE, HOSDURG, KASARAGOD.PIN-671 315.

2. VILLAGE OFFICER, AMABALATHARA VILLAGE, POST AMBALATHARA, VIA ANANDASRAMAM, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD.PIN-671 315.

3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD. PIN-671 315.

R1 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANITHA RAVINDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AD/

WP(C).No. 3133 of 2014 (N) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL 60 B 6926.

EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL 60 E 7261.

EXHIBIT P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL 60 B 9505.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE AD/

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.3133 of 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated, this the 10th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The vehicles bearing Nos. KL-60/B/6926, KL-60/E/7263 & KL-60/B/9505 were seized by the 3rd respondent alleging offence under the Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act and the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules. The main ground of challenge is that, the said respondent is not having the jurisdiction or authority to effect seizure.

2. Heard both the sides.

3. The authority of the respondent to effect seizure has already been considered by this Court and the power and competence has been upheld as per the decision reported in Aloshias C. Antony Vs. Government of Kerala [2014(1) KLT 536]. The said decision was rendered, also taking note of the nature of offence which is a 'cognizable' one (notwithstanding anything contained in the Cr.P.C) as stipulated in Section 21(6) of MMDR Act, 1957 and also placing reliance on the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Construction

W.P.(C) No.3133 of 2014 : 2 :

Materials Movers Association V. State of Kerala [2008 (4) KLT 909]. In the said circumstance, there is no tenable ground to call for interference.

4. When the matter came up for consideration on 6.2.2014, the vehicle was caused to be released, on satisfaction of a sum Rs.25,000/-. In the said circumstance, the further course of action required is to surrender the vehicle before the 3rd respondent, so as to enable the 3rd respondent to produce it before the concerned Magistrate having jurisdiction over the area and to proceed with steps for prosecution, unless the offence is sought to be compounded.

5. The petitioner expresses desire to compound the offence by virtue of the enabling provisions under the relevant provisions of law. This Court finds it fit and proper to permit the petitioner to have the offence compounded on satisfying the compounding fee of Rs.25,000/-. The amount ordered to be paid as per the interim order dated 6.2.2014 shall be treated as compounding fee and offence shall be treated as

W.P.(C) No.3133 of 2014 : 3 :

compounded. Once the offence is compounded, no prosecution proceedings will lie in view of the law declared by this Court in Digil Vs. Sub Inspector of Police [2013(1) KLT 600]. It shall be reported to the concerned Magistrate, if the crime has already been reported. If there is any failure in satisfying the compounding fee, the respondent shall pursue further steps in connection with the prosecution before the concerned Magistrate having jurisdiction over the area. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE rkc