G.Dinesh v. The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/27TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2995 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- G.DINESH, AGED 40 YEARS S/O. GOVINDAN, KURUTHIKODU HOUSE, THAROOR P.O., ALATHUR, PALAKKAD EMPANELLED CONDUCTOR KSRTC DEPOT, PALAKKAD UNDER THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, PALAKKAD BY ADV. SRI.JOHN JOSEPH(ROY) RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 039 REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR 695 039 2.

THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 039 3.

THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION PALAKKAD - 678 001 BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 2995 of 2015 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF CASH RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER UNDER NO. 31152 DATED 18.10.1993 P2 :

COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 22.12.2011 TO REGULARISE THE EMPANELLED EMPLOYEES OF THE CORPORATION P3 :

COPY OF CASH RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER UNDER NO. 40493 DATED 29.02.2012 P4 :

COPY OF THE DUTY STATEMENT ISSUED FROM THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 26.04.2012 TO THE PETITIONER P5 :

COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO. PL 16/014909/12 DATED 28.05.2012 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT MANAGING DIRECTOR P6:

COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11.11.2013 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.2995 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has been re-admitted to duty as evident by Ext. P7 communication. Therefore the services of the petitioner is liable to be regularised in the wake of Ext. P2 Government Order and Ext. P4 duty statement. Ext. P7 communication also lends support to the contentions of the petitioner.

2.

The respondents are directed to regularise the services of the petitioner within a period of two months. Ext. P5 order negating the claim of the petitioner is therefore quashed.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE