P.J.Joseph v. The Pathanamthitta Municipality
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/13TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 3224 of 2015 (C) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER:
P.J.JOSEPH, PUTHOOR HOUSE, THOTTAMON, RANNI P.O PATHANAMTHITTA DT.
BY ADVS.SRI.THAMPAN THOMAS SRI.B.V.JOY SANKER SRI.SHAFFIE THOMAS SRI.SANEESH KUNJUNJH SMT.JANCY ALEX SRI.JACOB CHACKO SRI.THARUN THANKACHEN PERUMAL RESPONDENTS:
1. THE PATHANAMTHITTA MUNICIPALITY, PATHANAMTHITTA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 689 672.
2. SECRETARY, THE PATHANAMTHITTA MUNICIPALITY PATHANAMTHITTA 689 672.
BY SRI.V.K.SUNIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX IN WPC 3224/2015 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXT. P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT DATED 25.9.2014 ISSUED BY THE MINING & GEOLOFY DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA EXT. P2 TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLOSIVES LICENCE ISSUED FROM THE EXPLOSIVES DEPARTMENT EXT. P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SHORT FIRER'S LICENCE DATED 25.3.2010 ISSUED FROM THE EXPLOSIVES DEPARTMENT EXT. P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT TO OPERATE THE QUARRY DATED 20.10.2014 BY THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD EXT. P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF APPLICATION FOR QUARRYING PERMIT DATED 10.12.2014 RESONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.3224 of 2015 C -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2015
JUDGMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, apart from perusing the record. Since the issue lies in a narrow compass, this Court proposes to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage itself.
2. Briefly stated, with a view to operating a quarry in Sy.No.58/10-5 of Pathanamthitta Village, Ranni Taluk, the petitioner is said to have applied for D & O licence on 10.12.2014 to the second respondent. Ventilating his grievance that despite strict statutory compliance, so far the respondent Municipality has not issued the licence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents has submitted that if the application, said to have been
WPC 3224/15 submitted by the petitioner, is in order, the respondents will take every step to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon expeditiously.
In the facts and circumstances, having regard to the respective submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel, this Court disposes of the writ petition with a direction to the second respondent to consider petitioner's application for D & O licence as expeditiously as possible, especially in the light of the fact that Exhibit P1 licence is to expire on 09.02.2015. At any rate, if the licence expires before the petitioner's application could be disposed of, the petitioner is at liberty to file renewed licence before the authorities, if necessary. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv