High Court of KeralaWP(C)/3274/2015disposed of

Auto Drivers Trade Union Co-Ordination Committee v. The Regional Transport Authority

2015-07-233 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2015/1ST SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 3274 of 2015 (H) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- AUTO DRIVERS TRADE UNION CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE, RAMANATTUKARA TOWN, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN MURALIDHARAN.P.K., WITH ITS REGISTRATION NO.SDTU 12 OF 2013, STU 192/86, BMS 203/73, CITU 314/68. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-673 020

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOZHIKODE-673 020

3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CITY TRAFFIC, KOZHIKODE-673 020

4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY TRAFFIC, RAMANATTUKARA-673 633 *ADDL.R5 & R6 IMPLEADED *Addl.R5. ANEESH MISHAD, S/O.ABDUL KALAM, AREEPARAMBUPILAKATT HOUSE, EAST NALLUR,FEROKE P.O, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 631. **(DELETED) *Addl.R6. RAJESH KUMAR,S/O BHASKARAN, MELATH HOUSE, P.O RAMANATTUKARA, KOZHIKODE - 673 633.

*IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 5 AND 6 AS PER ORDER DATED 04.03.2015 IN IA.NO. 3314/15.

**ADDL.R5 IS DELETED AS PER ORDER DATED 23/07/2015 IN IA.NO.7705/2015 R1 TO R4 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANITHA RAVINDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).NO.3274/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 3/3/2014. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE sts

SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.3274 of 2015 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioner has filed Ext.P1 representation before the 2nd Respondent against the illegal operation of auto-taxies within the limits of the 2nd Respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 2nd Respondent to take a decision on Ext.P1 representation filed by the petitioner.

Heard the learned Senior Government Pleader also. 3.

The learned Senior Government Pleader submits that if sufficient time is granted, the Authority will take a decision on Ext.P1.

There will be a direction to the 1st Respondent to take a decision on Ext.P1, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE