High Court of KeralaWP(C)/3323/2015disposed of

Janardhanan V.P. v. Regional Transport Authority

2015-02-03Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/14TH MAGHA, 1936` WP(C).No. 3323 of 2015 (M) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- JANARDHANAN V.P. , SON OF PAZHANIMALA, VETTUKAD HOUSE, MANJALLOOR P.O. PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678 502.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (TR) SRI.T.P.SAJAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------------------------------

1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY PALAKKAD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PALAKKAD - 678 001.

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY PALAKKAD - 678 001.

3. SHAIFUDHEEN K.B S/O.BHAVANKUTTI, 5/98, KOTTAKKAL HOUSE MANAKKAMPADAM, KINAVALLOOR P.O., PALAKKAD - 678 612.

4. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATON PALAKKAD - 678 001.

R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.CHACKO, SC, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-022015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 3323 of 2015 (M) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT OPERATED WITH KL - 49A/3232. EXT.P2: TRUE COPYOF THE AGENDA SHOWING ITEM NO. 48 OF THE RTA MEETING HELD ON 10/12/2013 AND THE DECSION THEREIN.

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24/07/2013 MVAA NO. 31/2014. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE AGENDA SHOWING ITEM NO. 84 OF THE RTA MEETING PROPOSED ON 20/01/2015.

EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 16/01/2015.

//True Copy// P.A. To Judge

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 3323 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 3rd February, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

The only contention of the petitioner is with respect to the objection filed against the variation sought for by the 3rd respondent. The variation was rejected and by Ext.P3, the same was remanded for fresh consideration. The meeting of the RTA, which was to consider the variation as per Ext.P3, was adjourned as indicated in Ext.P5. If the petitioner has filed an objection before the RTA, then, definitely the petitioner shall also be heard along with the KSRTC, before finalization of the variation. Writ petition disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//