Mannathu Kunnachu v. Govt. Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/21ST ASWINA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.16160 of 2004 (W) ----------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- MANNATHU KUNNACHU, W/O. K.T.KUNJUMOIDEEN, P.O. EDAYUR NORTH, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.RAVINDRAN.
RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------
1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).NO.16160 OF 2004-W APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- -------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 14.03.1991. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.14726/2000. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 31.5.2002 ISSUED FROM THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.
EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.4151/04 IN OP.NO.10831/03 DATED 6.4.2004.
EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 7.5.2004 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIOENR FROM UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------------ NIL.
vku/- [ true copy ]
K. Vinod Chandran, J ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.16160 of 2004-W ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner was concerned with the upgradation of a Lower Primary School to a Upper Primary School. By Exhibit P4, this Court directed that a decision, regarding the eligibility of the school for upgradation in the light of the report of the District Educational Officer be taken. The petitioner was aggrieved with Exhibit P5, wherein he was directed to take up the matter with the Government as and when a policy decision would be taken by the Government. The petitioner would be left with that remedy and all contentions are left open.
The writ petition is closed with the above observation.
Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/- [ true copy ]