High Court of KeralaWP(C)/3360/2015disposed of

E.Abdul Nazar v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-02-03Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/14TH MAGHA, 1936` WP(C).No. 3360 of 2015 (T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- E.ABDUL NAZAR, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.VEERAN KOYA HAJI, EDAKKUNNUMMAL HOUSE, MADRASA BASAR, KODUVALLY.

BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS:

------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 020.

2. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY THE ZONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE ZONE PIN-673020.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.CHACKO, SC, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI. R. RENJITH R BY SRI.P.C.CHACKO, SC, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CO THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 3360 of 2015 (T) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 - COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT ISSUING TIMING IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER'S SERVICE DATED 12.09.2013.

EXHIBIT P2 - COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE DATED 19.07.2014.

EXHIBIT P3 - COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.09.2014. EXHIBIT P4 - COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16.09.2014 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE DST

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 3360 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 3rd February, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

The petitioner had sought for a revision of timing since the KSRTC is said to have started a service which clashes with the timings of the petitioner's stage carriage. It is only appropriate that the petitioner's application at Ext.P4 be considered after hearing the KSRTC as also any rival operators concerned, within a period of one month from today.

Writ petition disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//