High Court of KeralaWP(C)/3393/2015disposed of

Valsala v. The Secretary

2015-02-05Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/16TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 3393 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- VALSALA, SREE VILASAM, THAZHUTHALA, KOTTIYAM P.O., KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT :

-------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM - 691 001.

BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 3393 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 1/1/2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.3393 of 2015 - Y ====================== Dated this the 5th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No. KL-02-R/7427 in the route Kottiyam- Kundara - Mukkada. The timings of the service was last settled on 15.04.1998, hence the petitioner filed an application to revise the timings by Ext.P1 dated 01.01.2015. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application. If Ext.P1 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of

W.P.(C) No.3393 of 2015 - Y publication of the above notice. Needless to say the petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge