← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13815/2005dismissed as infructuous

The Aluva Merchants Association v. T.M.Abdul Majeed

2015-07-15Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2015/24TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13815 of 2005 (T) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

-------------------------

1. THE ALUVA MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, REG.NO.776/2003, OLD MARKET, ALUVA POST, ALUVA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI.ABDUL JABBAR A.K.

2. ALUVA MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, REG.NO.E.R.119/1973, ALUVA POST, ALUVA TALUK, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI.ABDUL JABBAR A.K. BY ADVS.SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.JOJO GEORGE RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. T.M.ABDUL MAJEED, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O.MEETHIYAN PILLA, BANANA MERCHANT, MARKET, ALUVA.

2. M.K.ABDUL KHADER, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O.KOCHUNNY, BEST HOTEL, PALACE ROAD, ALUVA.

3. ASHRAF E., AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O.EBRAHIM, SABITHA TOURIST HOME, BRIDGE ROAD, ALUVA.

4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), O/O.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), ERNAKULAM. * ADDITIONAL R5 IMPLEADED

5. JOHNY URUMEES, S/O.M.V.URUMEES, MAMPILLY HOUSE, WALL STREET, ALWAYE-1, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. * ADDITIONAL R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 22.06.2005 IN I.A.NO.8739 OF 2005.

R1 TO R3 BY SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE (SENIOR ADVOCATE) R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ.P.KUNJACHAN ADDL.R5 BY ADVS. SRI.M.M.MONAYE SRI.M.PAUL VARGHESE SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.13815 of 2005 ====================== Dated this the 15th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are aggrieved by Exts.P3 and P6, which was with respect to a complaint filed before the Registrar of Societies. Admittedly there are civil disputes pending before this Court in a second appeal on the very same subject matter. Hence, the parties will be governed by the final orders in the second appeal.

The writ petition is infructuous and the same is dismissed, leaving open the contentions of either parties to be urged in the second appeal.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.