High Court of KeralaWP(C)/3473/2015disposed of

T.P.Prasanth v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-02-04Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/15TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 3473 of 2015 (H) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

--------------------- T.P.PRASANTH, AGED 36 YEARS THANAVELIL HOUSE, KOTHAVARA P.O., VAIKOM KOTTAYAM DISTRICT (EMPANEL ELECTRICIAN VAIKOM DEPOT).

BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, FORT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023.

2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

R1 BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 3473 of 2015 (H) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1- COPY OF THE ATTENDANCE STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED FROM THE KSRTC.

EXHIBIT P2- COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PAY REVISION AGREEMENT DATED 22-5-2012.

EXHIBIT P3- COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 17-1-2015 OF THE PETITIONER SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 3473 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 04th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks regularisation in the services of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation. It is so made on the basis of the Government Orders in vogue and also the judgment of this Court. Ext. P3 representation submitted by the petitioner is pending with the first respondent. 2.

I direct the first respondent to consider Ext. P3 representation with notice to the petitioner. Needless to say that the attendance details of the petitioner shall be duly adverted to. The needfull shall be done within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE