High Court of KeralaWP(C)/3551/2015disposed of

P.D.Poulose v. Kerala State Electricity Board Limited

2015-02-04Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/15TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 3551 of 2015 (T) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------- P.D.POULOSE, AGED 73 YEARS S/O.DEVASSY, USHUS CABLE TV NETWORK, PUTHANCHIRA THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------

1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 004

2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION OFFICE, K.S.E.B, IRINJALAKUDA THRISSUR DISTRICT. PIN - 680 121

3. CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE OFFICE K.S.E.B, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031 R BY SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 3551 of 2015 (T) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- P1- TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER WITH THE ELECTRICITY BOARD DATED 31.3.2011 P2- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD DATED 31.12.2014 P3- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 20.1.2015 P4- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD DATED 25.2.2012 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.3551 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The retrospective hike in pole rental is challenged by the petitioner by filing Ext.P3 representation. The dispute requires to be resolved by the third respondent as per clause 9 of Ext.P1 agreement.

2. I direct the third respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation with notice to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. The coercive steps as against the petitioner shall be put on hold in the meanwhile. This is subject to the condition that the petitioner clears the arrears as per the pre-revised rate.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.