Parameswaran v. The Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/16TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 3617 of 2015 (B) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- PARAMESWARAN, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, VAYYATT PUTHANVEETTIL HOUSE, KUTTIPPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676 505.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 3617 of 2015 (B) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: PHOTOCOPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 21.12.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
===================== W.P.(C) No.3617 of 2015 - B ====================== Dated this the 5th day of February, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No. KL-06/D-1246 in the route Valanchery - Kuttippuram - Maniyamkad. The timings of the service was last settled on 06.06.2011, hence the petitioner filed an application to revise the timings by Ext.P1 dated 02.12.2014. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application. If Ext.P1 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from
W.P.(C) No.3617 of 2015 - B the date of publication of the above notice. Needless to say the petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge