High Court of KeralaWP(C)/3964/2015disposed of

Koyamon v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram

2015-02-09Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/20TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 3964 of 2015 (U) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- KOYAMON, S/O.MOIDEEN BAVA, MARATHINGAL HOUSE, PUTHIYAKADAPPURAM, TANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT:

---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, PIN-676 505.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 3964 of 2015 (U) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

PHOTOCOPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 27.12.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

K. Vinod Chandran, J.

==================================== W.P.(C)No.3964 of 2015 ==================================== Dated this the 9th day of February, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No. KL-55/A1743 in the route Koottai Azhimugham - Kadalundi Nagaram (via) Koottai, Unniyal, Tanur, Parappanangadi and Alungal Beach. The timings of the service was last alloted on 10.5.2006, hence the petitioner filed an application to revise the timings by Ext.P1 dated 27.12.2014. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application. If Ext.P1 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall, within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in

W.P.(C)No.3964 of 2015 -:2:- the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of publication of the above notice. Needless to say the petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.

sl.