High Court of KeralaWP(C)/4066/2015disposed of

Radhakrishna Pillai v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-02-09Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/20TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 4066 of 2015 (G) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------------------ RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, SREEKRISHNA VILASAM, MEEYANA, VELINALLOR, NETTAYAM P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT -691 537 BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT :

-------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM -691 001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 4066 of 2015 (G) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 07-01-2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts

K. Vinod Chandran, J.

==================================== W.P.(C)No.4066 of 2015 ==================================== Dated this the 9th day of February, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No. KL-6C/144 in the route Chathannoor-Ummannoor. The timings of the service was last alloted on 7.9.2013, hence the petitioner filed an application to revise the timings by Ext.P1 dated 7.1.2015. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application. If Ext.P1 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall, within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of publication of the above

W.P.(C)No.4066 of 2015 -:2:- notice. Needless to say the petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.

sl.