Kurien Mathew v. The Secretary Regional Transport Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/27TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 4167 of 2015 (U) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- KURIEN MATHEW, CHENNIKARA HOUSE, AMAYANNOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM.

BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM-686 001. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 4167 of 2015 (U) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT P1 :

A TRUE COPY REPRESENTATION WITH PROPOSED TIMINGS FILED FOR REVISION OF OWN TIMINGS DATED 05-01-2015 BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.4167 of 2015 - U ====================== Dated this the 16th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of the application for revision of timings.

2. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that, the application itself was filed on 29.01.2015 and the petitioner was issued with a notice for hearing. Neither the petitioner nor his representative appeared before the authority. In such circumstance, no mandamus can be issued.

The writ petition would stand dismissed.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge