Aneesh T.K. v. The Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/1ST PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 4267 of 2015 (G) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- ANEESH T.K. , PANIKARUVEETTIL HOUSE, PO BALUSSERY, CALICUT BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA 673 101 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-022015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 4267 of 2015 (G) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT APPLICATION DATED 12-1-2015 ON THE ROUTE VENGAD-KANNUR-KOZHIKODE WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 56/H 1743 IN PLACE OF KL 58C/5857 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT DATED 24-1-2015 //True Copy// P.A. To Judge
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 4267 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 20th February, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has applied for a temporary permit in the route Vengad - Kannur - Kozhikode which is said to be in the place of a regular permit issued in favour of stage carriage bearing No.KL 58C/5857. The petitioner contends that the said stage carriage is not operating on the route and there is a defaulted service.
2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the stage carriage in the regular permit has been released on clearance certificate and no substitution has been made till date. However, that alone may not be a reason to refuse the temporary permit. The Secretary would have to consider the need for such a service and also look at the available
WP(C).4267/15 timings before a decision is taken on the temporary permit. The learned Government Pleader also submits that the application has been rejected. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that no order has been received.
3. In the above circumstances, written orders shall be issued within a period of one week from today to the petitioner and the petitioner is entitled to challenge the same before the appropriate authority.
Writ petition disposed of.
SD/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//