High Court of KeralaWP(C)/8035/2012closed

Satyakrishnakumar v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-02Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 8035 of 2012 (D) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- SATYAKRISHNAKUMAR W/O.MR.KRISHNAMUMAR, PATTANCHERI HOUSE PATTANCHERI ROAD, PETTA, POONITHURA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SMT.VINEETHA B.

SMT.V.V.RISANI RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ERNAKULAM.

4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ALUVA RURAL, ERNAKULAM-683 101.

5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE HILL PALACE POLICE STATION, THRIPPUNITHURA-682 301.

6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THODUPUZHA TOWN STATION, THODUPUZHA IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 584.

7. OMANA T., MOORTHIYIL HOUSE, KALAYANTHANI P.O., THODUPUZHA IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 584.

R1 TO R6 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.R. SYAM KUMAR R7 BY ADV. SRI.VIJAI MATHEWS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 8035 of 2012 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

--------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 23.2.2012 TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT AND ITS TRANSLATION.

EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 22.3.2012 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND ITS TRANSLATION.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL ---------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.

& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P. (C) No. 8035 of 2012 ================== Dated this, the 2nd day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

This writ petition has been filed seeking police protection alleging that the 7th respondent was unnecessarily harassing the petitioner. According to the petitioner, there are telephonic abuse and threats from the 7th respondent.

Learned Government Pleader submits that after the filing of the writ petition, no untoward incident had been reported. Hence, we close this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the police, if there is any offence committed or there is attempt to commit offence.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp 2/11/2015 //True Copy// PS to Judge