Rajeev Kumar v. The Spl.Tahsildar (Lr), Ottapalam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/22ND MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 4303 of 2015 (K) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------- RAJEEV KUMAR, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.VASU, VENNUPARAMBIL, NORTH ANNARA TIRUR POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEHARI RESPONDENTS :

----------------------

1. THE SPL.TAHSILDAR (LR), OTTAPALAM (LAND REFORMS), OFFICE OF THE SPL.TAHSILDAR (L R) OTTAPALAM - 679 101.

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ANAKKARA VILLAGE, ANAKKARA POST PIN : 679 551, PALAKKAD DIST.

R1 & R2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

WP(C).No. 4303 of 2015 (K) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1: PHOTO COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DT.13.9.2013 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P-2: PHOTO COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 22.9.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT FILED BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P-3: PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO.29547/2012N DT.12.12.2012.

EXT.P-4: PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO.1561/2013 DT.16.1.2013 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

----------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 4303 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

"(a) Direct the first Respondent to consider the Petitioner's Application SM No.2802/2013 for issuance of Purchase Certificate in respect of 40 cents of land in Sy.No.61 of Anakkara Village and pass orders on merit within a specified period;

(b) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 2.

Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3.

Considering the limited extent of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the issue on merits. 4.

After hearing both the sides, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 1st respondent to consider SM No.2702/2013 which is pending before the 1st respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months after completing all the formalities including issuance of notice to the petitioner and other interested parties if any. Sd/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

/true copy/ P. A. to Judge Pn