← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/11730/2007dismissed for default

Benny Jose v. State And ORS.

2015-07-03Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2015/12TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11730 of 2007 (U) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- BENNY JOSE, S/O JOSEPH, AGED 41 YEARS KONGOLA HOUSE, MUKKOM P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT. OF TAXES, GOVT. SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KOZHIKODE.

3. THE EXCISE RANGE INSPECTOR, KUNNAMANGALAM RANGE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

4. THE EXCISE RANGE INSPECTOR, KOZHIKODE.

5. THE EXCISE RANGE INSPECTOR, FAROOQ.

6. THE EXCISE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KOZHIKODE.

7. KOZHIKODE TALUK TODDY TAPPERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY REG.NO.D 2729, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, T.A.AYYAPPAN MANDIRAM, ANI HALL ROAD KOZHIKODE.

8. P.A.CHANDRASEKHARAN, PRESIDENT, KOZHIKODE TALUK TODDY TAPPERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY REG.NO.D 2729, T.A.AYYAPPAN MANDIRAM, ANI HALL ROAD KOZHIKODE.

(CNTD)

WP(C).No. 11730 of 2007 (U) ----------------------------

9. MOHANAN, EX.SECRETARY AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER OF KOZHIKODE TALUK TODDY TAPPERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY REG.NO.D 2729 T.A.AYYAPPAN MANDIRAM, ANI HALL ROAD, KOZHIKODE. R1-R6 BY ADV. P.V. ELIAS, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JV

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J.

------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11730 of 2007 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

On 07.04.2015, when the case was taken up for final hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Since service of notice on some of the respondents was not complete, this Court directed the petitioner to take steps before 10.04.2015. Today, when the case was taken up for further consideration, none appears for the petitioner. Petitioner has also not taken any steps to serve notice on respondents 5 and 6. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed for default. SD/- ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JV JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE