High Court of KeralaWP(C)/11738/2007dismissed

Vanaja Vijayan v. State Of Kerala & 5 Others

2015-04-08Honourable Mr.Justice K.Surendra Mohan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/18TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 11738 OF 2007 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

------------- VANAJA VIJAYAN, W/O.P.K.VIJAYAN, PAZHAYIDAM HOUSE, PAINGATTOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE JACOB (JOSE) SMT.RESHMI POULOSE RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI.

3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE & ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, THODUPUZHA.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, THODUPUZHA.

5. SRI.ABBAS, VILLAGE OFFICER, KUMARAMANGALAM.

6. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THODUPUZHA.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ABHIJETT LESSLI BY SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 11738 OF 2007 (V) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE INVOICE PREPARED AND GIVEN TO THE HIRER OF THE VEHICLE.

EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.11.2006 CALLING UPON THE PETITIONER TO MEET THE DY.S.P., THODUPUZHA WITHIN 48 HOURS. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 25.11.2006 ADDRESSED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4 :COPY OF THE LETTER ADDRESSED TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 28.11.2006 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 25.03.2007 BEFORE THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER.

EXT.P7 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 22.11.2006 RECEIVED FROM THE DY.S.P., THODUPUZHA.

EXT.P8 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 17.03.2007 RECEIVED FROM THE DY.S.P. THODUPUZHA.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE

K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J -------------------------------- W.P.(C). No.11738 of 2007 -------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of April 2015

J U D G M E N T

No representation for the petitioner today also. The matter is posted before me in the defect list. Though time has been granted on previous occasions, no steps taken to cure the defects. The petitioner is obviously not interested in prosecuting the case. The writ petition, in the above circumstances dismissed.

K. SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE