High Court of KeralaWP(C)/4632/2015disposed of

Vinu Paul v. The State Of Kerala

2015-02-13Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/24TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 4632 of 2015 (D) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- VINU PAUL AGED 28 YEARS SON OF M.V. POULOSE, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT EBNEZER HIGH SCHOOL, VEETTOOR, NELLAD ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 721 BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETRAY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION ERNAKULAM AT KAKKANAD 680 030

4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 686 661

5. THE MANAGER, EBENEZER HIGH SCHOOL, VEETTOOR, NELLAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 686 721 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER: SRI V VIJULAL SR.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 4632 of 2015 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------ EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1.6.2010 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. B1/2903/10/ K.DIS DATED 10.6.2011 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. B4/ 12030/11/ K.DIS DATED 8.2.2012 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1.6.2011 OF THE PETITIONER AND APPROVAL THEREON EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.EC3/73306/12/DPI/K.DIS DATED 24.4.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 31.12.2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL True Copy/ P A to Judge

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

========================= W.P(C).No.4632 of 2015 ============================ Dated this the 13th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioner was appointed as Upper Primary School Assistant in the 5th respondent school as per Ext.P1 from 01.06.2010 to 31.03.2013. This appointment was rejected by Exts.P2 and P3. Thereafter, petitioner was appointed in a promotion vacancy from 01.06.2011 onwards and this appointment was approved. The only dispute is relating to the period mentioned in Ext.P1 from 01.06.2010 to 31.03.2013. Petitioner approached the Government in revision. Ext.P6 is the memorandum of revision.

In view of pendency of Ext.P6, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P6 after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and 5th respondent Manager within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.

Sbna/18/02/15