High Court of KeralaWP(C)/4636/2015disposed of

P.Sunil v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-02-19Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/30TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 4636 of 2015 (D) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- P.SUNIL AGED 49 YEARS "THIRUVATHIRA", CHAVARCODE, NAVAIKULAM PO THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT (CONDUCTOR KSRTC ATTINGAL DEPOT) BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY THE MANAING DIRECTOR KSRTC THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 023

2. ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, ATTINGAL DEPOT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 603 R BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-022015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 4636 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1: COPY OF THE OUT PATIENT RECORD ISSUED FROM THE MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM EXT.P2: COPY OF THE TREATMENT RECORDS ISSUED FROM THE SREE CHITRA THIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANATHAPURAM EXT.P3: COPY DISABILITY CERTIFICATE DATED 15.7.13 ISSUED FROM THE DISTRICT MEDICAL BOARD EXT.P4: COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 7.3.2014 ISSUED FROM THE KSRTC MEDICAL CENTRE EXT.P5: COPY OF MEMORANDUM DATED 26.2.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P6: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 2.2.2015 OF THE PETITIONER RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS - NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.4636 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner was earlier posted on light duty as evident by Exhibit P5 memorandum. This was on account of the fact that he suffered permanent disability. The petitioner asserts that the permanent disability has been assessed at 40%. The petitioner has by Exhibit P6 representation sought for continued posting on light duty. I direct the first respondent to consider Exhibit P6 representation with notice to the petitioner. The judgment in WPC No.11438/2014 dealing with the right of employees with disability shall also to be adverted to. The needful shall be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of.

V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE