High Court of KeralaWP(C)/4645/2015disposed of

K.M.M.Siddiq Mussaliar v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate

2015-02-13Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/24TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 4645 of 2015 (E) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

----------------------- K.M.M.SIDDIQ MUSSALIAR, S/O.ABDUL LATHEEF MUSSALIAR, FATHIMA BHAVAN, KURITTISSERY VILLAGE, MANNAR P.O, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.VINOD J.DEV SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT- 689 121

2. SURESH, KARANCHERIL HOUSE, KURITTISSERY VILLAGE, MANNAR P.O.,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689 622 R1 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 4645 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DTD 29/4/2014 P2:

A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD 5/1/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.4645 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

"(i) a writ of mandamus or such other writ, direction or order directing the 1st respondent to consider and take appropriate action on Exhibit P2 complaint pending before him as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a time frame to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court;

(ii) such other writ or direction as is prayed for pendente lite by the petitioner and as is deemed fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court."

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. Considering the limited extent of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the issue on merits.

4. After hearing both the sides, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, with notice to the petitioner and also to the 2nd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at the earliest, at any rate, within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

W.P.(C) No.4645 of 2015 Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition, before the first respondent, for further steps.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE sp