Sukumaran v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/26TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 14880 of 2006 (U) --------------------------------------------- PETITIONERS:
1. SUKUMARAN, S/O. GOVINDAN, THAKARAPARAMBU HOUSE, PARAPPUZHA VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
2. S. ANILKUMAR, KURUSIMUTTATHU HOUSE, VILAVOOR THEKKU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
3. SANTHOSH KUMAR, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. VELUKUTTY, PIRAVILAKATHU HOUSE, PEYAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. A. VINU, S/O. APPUKUTTAN, B.P. NAGAR, CHANDAMUKKU, VILAPPIL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.C.C.THOMAS (SR.) RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE ASST.EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. K.C. MANI, S/O. PUTHUNNI, ERUVELI, MANGANAM, VIJAYAPURAM, KOTTAYAM., (LICENSEE, TODDY SHOP NO.9 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM EXCISE RANGE).
5. VELAPPAN, S/O. NARAYANAN, PLAVARATHALA PUTHENVEEDU, ARALUMMODU, ATHIYANOOR NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
(LICENSEE, TODDY SHOP NO.12, THIRUMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM EXCISE RAGNE).
6. CHANDRA BABU, S/O. ARJUNAN, ETTUKUZHI, KALLUVILA VEEDU, KATTACHALKUZHI P.O., VENGANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ( LICENSEE, TODDY SHOP NO.8, KADINAMKULAM, KAZHAKUTTOM EXCISE RANGE.)
7. ANIL KUMAR, T.C.48/307,POTHENCODE P.O., MADATHARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. (LICENSEE TODDY SHOP NO.9, KADAKAVOOR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU EXCISE RANGE).
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.14880 of 2006 U -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of August, 2015
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this Court dismisses the writ petition as having become infructuous.
Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv