Abdul Kareem v. Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/1ST PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 4780 of 2015 (V) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- ABDUL KAREEM AGED 45 YEARS S/O.HASSAN, KALLAMPARAMBIL HOSUE, P O PALAPETTY PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MALAPPURAM DIST, MALAPPURAM 676 505

2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PONNANI POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DIST 676 505

3. ABDUL JABBAR S/O.HASSAINAR, NARIPARAMBU DESOM, KALLADI VILLAGE PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST 679 571 BY SENIORGOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.R. SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 4780 of 2015 (V) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :- TRUE COPY OF THE FABRICATED AGREEMENT CREATED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT P2 :

ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT P1 P3 :- TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DTD 5/1/2015 P4 :

-ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT P3 P5 :- TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE CAUSED TO BE ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT P6 :- EXGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT P5 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag. C.J.

& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 4780 of 2015 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, J Heard the counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. No notice is required to be issued to the 3rd respondent in view of the nature of Judgment being passed in the Writ Petition.

2.

This Writ Petition has been filed alleging police harassment. The petitioner prays for a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner by pressurizing him to pay the amount illegally demanded by the 3rd respondent.

3.

Learned Government Pleader, after obtaining instructions, submitted that complaint was submitted by the 3rd respondent to the Superintendent of Police, which has

W.P.(C) No. 4780/2015 -2been forwarded to the 2nd respondent for enquiry. In connection of the said complaint, the petitioner was called to appear at the Police Station. But since he did not appear, complaint could not be enquired. It is submitted that no kind of arrest has been meted to the petitioner by the Police, since he has not appeared so far.

4.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation. In the above view of the matter, we do not find that this is a case of police harassment. The petitioner may appear before the police station as required by the authority.

With these observation, this Writ Petition is closed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.

Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.

jjj