High Court of KeralaWP(C)/4972/2015disposed of

Jyothi Shalini v. The Secretary

2015-12-17Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 4972 of 2015 (V) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- JYOTHI SHALINI AGED 30 YEARS D/O.RAJENDRANATH K., CHAKKANATTU HOUSE, PARAKODE P.O. ADOOR.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA PIN - 689 645.

Addl.2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.(ADDL.R2 IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 25.02.2015.) R1 BY ADV. K.A.SANJEETHA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 4972 of 2015 (V) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 05/04/2014 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.NO. 10502 OF 2014 DATED 08/04/2014.

EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02/08/2014. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE GO (P) 85/2013/TRAN DATED 30/08/2013 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT.

EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL DATED 07/11/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMITS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09/12/2014 FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT.

EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.NO. 33994 OF 2014 DATED 16/12/2014.

EXT.P10: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 16/01/2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY SKS P.A TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 4972 OF 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

There is no subsisting grievance for the petitioner. Hence the writ petition is disposed of.

V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE sks