High Court of KeralaWP(C)/5103/2015disposed of

T.P.Shihabudheen v. The Assistant Commissioner (Kvat)-I

2015-02-23Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/4TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 5103 of 2015 (K) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- T.P. SHIHABUDHEEN, PROPRIETOR, FEDERAL RUBBER MARKETING AGENCY, THANTHODE, IRITTY, KANNUR-670 593.

BY ADV. SRI.DALE P.KURIEN.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (KVAT)-I COMMERCIAL TAXES, KANNUR-670 001.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, MINI BYE-PASS ERANJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE - 650 004.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.SUDHEESH KUMAR.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 5103 of 2015 (K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 22-09-2014. EXT.P1(A) - TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 16-10-2014 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 29-12-2014. EXT.P3NIL.

EXT.P4NIL.

EXT.P5TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 18/02/2015 FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), KOZHIKODE.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. ............................................................. Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2015 J U D G M E N T Against Ext.P1 assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P5 stay petition before the 2nd respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that even prior to considering the stay petition, recovery steps are sought to be pursued for recovery of the amounts confirmed by Ext.P1 assessment order.

2. Heard Sri.Dale.P.Kurian, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Sudheesh Kumar, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions:

i. The 2nd respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 stay petition within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.

ii. Recovery steps pursuant to Exts.P1(a)

demand notice shall be kept in abeyance till orders are passed by the 2nd respondent as directed above and communicated to the petitioner.

iii. The order to be passed by the 2nd respondent shall be a reasoned one adverting to the contentions of the petitioner regarding existence of a prima facie case for a stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns