Aboobacker v. The Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/4TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 5187 of 2015 (W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- ABOOBACKER, S/O. LATE KHADER, VEETTILAVALAPPIL HOUSE, KOTTATHARA, MANNARKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD - 678 001. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 5187 of 2015 (W) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT. P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DT. 30.6.11. EXT. P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 25083/2014 DT. 13.10.14. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.5187 of 2015 - W ====================== Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner had been granted a regular permit and admittedly no current records of a vehicle was offered for issuance of the same. However, in the meanwhile, the petitioner had sought for a temporary permit and had obtained the same, with respect to a particular stage carriage vehicle. Now a further application for temporary permit is filed with a different vehicle than that was offered in the earlier application for temporary permit. The mere fact that another vehicle is offered cannot stand against the petitioner. In any way, the application shall be considered in accordance with law by the authority within a period of two weeks from today.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge