Jose A.Kollannur v. Thrissur Corporation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/6TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 5201 of 2015 (A) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- JOSE A.KOLLANNUR, S/O.ANTONY, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOLLANNUR HOUSE, EAST FORT P.O., THRISSUR -680 005.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.P.S.APPU RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THRISSUR CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR -680 001.

2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,THRISSUR CORPORTATION, THRISSUR -680 001 R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATION SRI.V.N.HARIDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 5201 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICE, OLLUR DATED 29/9/2014 EXHIBIT P1(E) COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P1. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER AND HIS WIFE DATED 28/1/2015 EXHIBIT P2(E) COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P3 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICITING THE LIE OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY DATED NIL EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 18776/2014 ON THE FILE OF THIS HONOURBLE COURT DATED 22/7/2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 5201 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

In the light of the ratio laid down in the judgment dated 22.07.2014 in W.P. (C) No. 18776/2014, the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same lines applying the ratio laid down by the learned single Judge in the said decision, thereby quashing Exhibit P2.

Consequently, the first respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner for building permission afresh, if necessary, by referring the matter to the District Town Planner, and thereafter pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-