High Court of KeralaWP(C)/9024/2012dismissed as infructuous

M.K.Gopalakrishnan v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-30Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/8TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9024 of 2012 (C) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ----------------- M.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN VRINDAVANAM, T.C.NO.27/666, VANCHIYOOR.P.O.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 035. NOW RESIDING AT T.C.NO.10/948(7) MRA 94, GOKULAM, MANNAMMOOLA, PEROORKADA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADVS.SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH SRI.PRATHAP. S.R.K.

SRI.PRAVEEN.S SRI.ACHUTH KYLAS DR.K.P.KYLASANATHA PILLAY (SR.) RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GENERAL ADMINISTRATION & LAW AND ORDER POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001.

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY.695 001.

4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE SHANGHUMUGHAM, PETTAH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001.

5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VANCHIYOOR POLICE STATION. 695 035.

6. REJITH SON OF M.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN, VRINDAVANAM, T.C.NO.27/666 VANCHIYOOR.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 035.

7. CARMEL @ BINDU W/O.RENJITH, VRINDAVANAM, T.C.NO.27/666 VANCHIYOOR.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 035.

R1 TO R5 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9024 of 2012 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of October 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for police protection. During the pendency of the writ petition, the matter was referred to mediation and it is reported that the petitioner and respondents 6 and 7 have entered into an interim arrangement and an undertaking has been filed jointly by them on 13.4.2012. Under such circumstances, we do not think that anything survives to be done in the matter. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Jvt/3.11.2015