Jose v. Regional Transport Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/13TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 9040 of 2012 (D) --------------------------- PETITIONER:
----------- JOSE, AGED 34 YEARS S/O.POULOSE, 2/272, KOLENCHERY HOUSE KUTTIKKAD P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H.
RESPONDENTS:
------------
1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER THRISSUR - 680 001.
2. THE DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER KERALA MOTOR TRANSPORT WORKERS WELFARE FUND THRISSUR, PIN 680 001.
3. EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 017.
4. M/S.SEENA BUS SERVICE KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN - 676 505, REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR, VELAYUDHAN R3 BY ADV. DR.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.) R BY SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) R BY SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN,SC,EPF ORGANISATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 9040 of 2012 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
---------------------- EXT.P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF BUS NO.KL-55E-4432.
EXT.P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 27.12.2011 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS EXHIBIT.P1 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL ---------------------- TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE Scl.
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
--------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9040 of 2012 ------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the registered owner of a stage carriage bearing registration No.KL-55E-4432, which was purchased from the fourth respondent on payment of consideration. The petitioner alleges that the previous owner was paying contribution under the Employees Provident Fund Act and according to the petitioner, the entire amount was paid by the fourth respondent till the date of sale ie, upto the period ending 30.9.2011. The petitioner is aggrieved by the stand taken by respondents 1 and 2 in refusing to accept contribution towards Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund and also requesting to accept the tax for the up-coming quarter. It is in this context, the petitioner has come up before this Court.
2.
This Court by an interim order dated 10-4-2012 directed the first respondent to accept Motor Vehicle tax
W.P.(c) No.9040/2012 -2relating to the petitioner's vehicle for the period commencing from 1.4.2012, without insisting on proof of payment of the Welfare Fund dues for the period prior to September, 2011. 3.
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent submits that the payment upto September 2011 has been paid by the previous owner and payment from October 2011 onwards is due.
In the light of the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to pay the dues under the Employees Provident Fund Act to the second respondent Board from October, 2011 onwards.
Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE Scl.