High Court of KeralaWP(C)/5387/2015disposed of

Hassan Shareef.K v. State Of Kerala

2015-02-20Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/1ST PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 5387 of 2015 (W) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- HASSAN SHAREEF.K AGED 29 YEARS HSA (NS), M.M.E.T., HIGH SCHOOL MELMURI, MALAPPURAM 676517 BY ADVS.SRI.AUGUSTINE JOSEPH SRI.K.S.ROCKEY SRI.TONY AUGUSTINE RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001

2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM 676505

3. THE MANAGER, M.M.E.T. HIGH SCHOOL, MELMURI, MALAPPURAM-676505 R1 & R2 BY ADV.M.A. FAYAZ, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 5387 of 2015 (W) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 13.6.2012 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2:

COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.8.2014 FROM THE DPI EXHIBITP3:

COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 3.1.2015 PENDING BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: N I L --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JV

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 5387 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner was appointed as HSA in a resignation vacancy. The 2nd respondent, District Education Officer, rejected the approval of appointment. Thereupon the petitioner approached Director of Public Instructions. By Ext.P2 order, that appointment of the petitioner approved on daily wages from 13.06.2012 to 31.03.2013 and thereafter from the next academic year onwards on regular scale of pay was approved. Aggrieved by the approval of appointment on daily wages for the period from 13.06.2012 to 31.03.2013, the petitioner approached the Government by Ext.P3 Revision Petition.

2. The limited prayer of the petitioner is for an early disposal of Ext.P3. In the above circumstance, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 revision petition within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of

W.P.(C) No.5387/2015 hearing to the petitioner.

The writ petition is diposed of accordingly.

SD/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JV JUDGE