High Court of KeralaWP(C)/5690/2015disposed of

K.A. Kabeer v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-02-24Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/5TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 5690 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER:

-------------------------- K.A. KABEER, AGED 53 YEARS DRIVER, KSRTC, ERUMELI DEPOT ERUMELI RESIDING AT KULATHUNKAL HOUSE MUKKUTTUTHARA P.O., ELIVALIKKARA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K.SATHEES KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, TRIVANDRUM-695 023.

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT TRIVANDRUM-695 023.

3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION (IN CHARGE) KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT TRIVANDRUM-695 023.

BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 5690 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT REMITTED AT KOTTAYAM UNIT FOR RS.3000/- TOWARDS SECURITY DEPOSIT.

EXHIBIT P2: THE TRUE COPIES OF THE DUTY CERTIFICATES ISSUED FROM THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION FOR THE ENTIRE PERIOD. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED ON 6.2.2015. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE DUTY PASS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.12.2011 OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.

EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.12.2011 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 5690 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks regularisation in service on the basis of Suresh Kumar C.R. and Others v. State of Kerala and Others [2013 (2) KHC 220]. There is no reason as to why the services of the petitioner shall not be so regularised in the light of Ext. P2 duty certificates and Ext. P5 Government Order.

I accordingly direct the second respondent to consider Ext. P3 representation put in by the petitioner for regularisation in service. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE