High Court of KeralaWP(C)/5778/2015disposed of

Annie Babu v. The District Collector

2015-02-24Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/5TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 5778 of 2015 (V) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- ANNIE BABU, AGED 35 YEARS 16/142, NEHRU COLONY, KUNNATHURMED P.O PALAKKAD BY ADVS.SRI.D.KISHORE SMT.MINI GOPINATH RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALAKKAD-678 001

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD-678 001

3. THE TAHSILDAR ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 541

4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER MATHUR II VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 571 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C. VINCENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-02- 2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STK

WP(C).No. 5778 of 2015 (V) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE DATED 3-2-2015 ALONG WITH THE APPROVED PLAN ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, MATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT.

EXHBIIT P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX REGISTER PERTAINING TO THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDEN.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE STK

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

======================== W.P.(C). No. 5778 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

"1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 representation submitted by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.

2. Grant such other reliefs which this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice." The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has also been projected by way of Ext.P3 representation which is pending consideration before the 4th respondent and that the petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the said respondent to have it considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. After hearing both the sides, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 representation in accordance with law after

W.P.C. No.5778 of 2015 -2giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner at the earliest, at any rate, within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 4th respondent for further steps.

Sd/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

kp/-