Aneesh K. v. The Kottayam Textiles
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/19TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 5783 of 2015 (W) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
1. ANEESH K. AGED 40 YEARS S/O.KARUNAKARAN, T.12, PREPERATORY KOTTAYAM TEXTILES, KURUMULLOOR P.O., KANAKKARY KOTTAYAM.
2. ANEESH A.V., AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.VIJAYAN, T.NO.306, PREPERATORY T.12, PREPERATORY, KOTTAYAM TEXTILES KURUMULLOOR P.O., KANAKKARY, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS.SMT.P.R.REENA SRI.SUNIL.M.KARANY RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE KOTTAYAM TEXTILES (A UNIT OF KERALA STATE TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD) REPRESENTED BY ITS UNIT-IN-CHARGE, KURUMULLOOR P.O. KANAKKARY, KOTTAYAM, PIN: 686 639.
2. UNIT IN CHARGE, THE KOTTAYAM TEXTILES, KURUMULLOOR P.O., KANAKKARY KOTTAYAM, PIN: 686 639.
3. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA TEXTILE CORPORATION, ANNAPOORANA, TC 9/2000-01 KOCHAR ROAD, SASTHAMANGALAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 010.
BY SRI.V.E.ABDUL GAFOOR SC KERALA STATE TEXTILE CORPO BY ADV. SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS BY ADV. SRI.BINU MATHEW BY ADV. SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL) BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS BY ADV. SRI.ISAAC THOMAS BY ADV. SRI.NOBY THOMAS CYRIAC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-032015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 5783 of 2015 (W) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS ALONG WITH THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 28/01/2015.
P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET AND SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 30/01/2015.
P3: THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE STANDING ORDER OF KOTTAYAM TEXTILES P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE MANAGING DIRECTOR DATED 10/02/2015.
//True Copy// P.S. To Judge
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 5783 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 10th March, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
Petitioners are the workers under the 1st respondent who have been proceeded against for mis-conduct. The petitioners seek certiorari of Ext.P2 notice issued by the 1st respondent.
It is trite that no certiorari can be issued against a show cause notice. When a domestic enquiry has been initiated, necessarily the petitioners would have to face the same. The writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is found to be not maintainable and the same is dismissed.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//