High Court of KeralaWP(C)/5816/2015closed

Naseema Beevi v. Director General Of Police

2015-03-25Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/4TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 5816 of 2015 (B) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- NASEEMA BEEVI, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O.MURUKAN, THOPPUVILA HOUSE, PARASSALA, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN,SENIOR ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN: 695 001.

2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN: 695 001.

3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN: 695 121.

4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARASSALA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN: 695 502.

5. VISWAN @ UNNI, S/O.MADHAVAN PILLAI, I.M.P. BHAVANAM, PADANTHALUMOODU, VILAVANCODE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, PIN: 629 163. R1 TO R4 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. S.HYMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 5816 of 2015 (B) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA DATED 1/11/2012. P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DATED 20/10/2012.

P3:

TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 14/5/2014 BEFORE THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE P4:

TRUE COPY OF INTIMATION DATED 11/12/2013 ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts

P. UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.5816 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The writ petitioner herein seeks a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to register a crime on Ext.P1 complaint made by her husband, and to conduct proper investigation. Now, there is report that the police has already registered a crime on the Ext.P1 complaint, and that effective investigation is going on. The writ petitioner is now satisfied, and her grievance stands practically redressed. In the above circumstances, the writ petition can be closed with direction to the investigating officer to make effective investigation, and submit final report without delay.

In the result, this petition is closed with direction to the investigating officer to conduct effective investigation in the crime registered on the writ petitioner's complaint, and submit final report, without any delay.

Sd/- P. UBAID, JUDGE sd