Shibu Markose v. The Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/6TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No.5947 of 2015 (P) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- SHIBU MARKOSE,AVALUMTHADATHIL HOUSE, PINDIMANA P.O.,KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,MUVATTUPUZHA,PIN-686 661. 2.

THE SECRETARY,THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA,PIN-686 661.

3.

JOY K.JOSEPH,VELOORKARAYIL HOUSE,EDAYAR P.O.

KOOTHATTUKULAM-686 662.

4.

JOSE K.V.,KANNANICKAL HOUSE, THATTEKKADU P.O,KOTHAMANGALAM-686 691.

R1 & R2 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

WP(C).No.5947 of 2015 (P) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------ EXT P1:TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 23-12-20113 BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT P2:TRUE COPY OF THE CAVEAT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE MUNSIFF'S COURT,MUVATTUPUZHA.

EXT P3:TRUE COPY OF THE AGENDA WITH RESPECT TO ITEM NO.51 OF THE MEETING OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT HELD ON 13-02-2015. EXT P4:TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE RTA,MUVATTUPUZHA.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 5947 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 25th February, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the objection to the transfer application jointly filed by the 3rd and 4th respondents has not been considered. Without observing anything on merits, this Court would only direct that Ext.P4 objection filed by the petitioner, be considered when the matter is taken up if the same has not already been considered.

Writ petition disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//